Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

> RAW Viewer for windows, - for the camera techies
camsmith
post Aug 6 2005, 07:25 AM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: [RP PB]
Posts: 653
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 178



For those of you with Canon or Nikon digital cameras taking phoos in RAW format, Microsoft have released a RAW viewer.


It finally gets thumbnails on to your explorer. Makes it much easier to oraganise the photos.

Click here - but be warned, you need to validate windows to get it.


--------------------
May you live as long as you want to...
... and want to as long as you live!

IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
james
post Aug 6 2005, 01:16 PM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3296
Joined: 2-March 01
From: Surrey, UK
Member No.: 13



Not from a production perspective yet, but I have played around with the converter.

Advantage over the 3 file format's you mentioned:

GIF - you shouldn't be using GIF for anything other than small graphics with low numbers of component colours for use on the web - it has an adaptive 256 colour palette making it totally unsuitable for full-tone reproduction.

JPEG - it's lossy - at highest quality / lowest compression settings it's not overly noticeable on all but the most extreme images, but whichever way you cut it some data has been hocked to make the file smaller.

TIFF - a 24bit (or 32bit) TIFF will be bigger than an equivalent RAW or DNG file (in terms of disk space) with a lower gamut (normally)

and advantages of RAW or DNG over all of the above:
Broader data (normally 12 bits from each sensor/filtered layer) allows for more adjustment (white balance, colour temperature, exposure) etc, they are free from in-camera processing (USM, other kinds of sharpening and WB/CT data) which allow more flexibility for adjusting the image 'in post' with less quality issues.

I like the idea of DNG (or any open standard) over RAW purely because as is so often the case - 'the good thing about standards is there are so many to choose from'.

Once the images have been post-processed it would be fine to store them as TIFF's (or max quality JPG's for archive/backup purposes), but the ability to go back to the 'raw' files and tweak things at a later date is nice.


--------------------
"We are number one, all others are number two or lower!" - The Sphinx, Mystery Men

"A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head" - annon

"What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at all. How true that is." - Dan Quayle

IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



-   Time is now: 14th November 2025 - 11:50 AM

Content © ringerpatrol.net 2001-2007 -- Design by Designified

www.designified.com